<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; Full</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benchmarkitconsulting.com/tag/full/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benchmarkitconsulting.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:34:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SQL 2000 Replication&#8230; changing Recovery Mode</title>
		<link>http://benchmarkitconsulting.com/colin-stasiuk/2009/06/11/sql-2000-replication-changing-recovery-mode/</link>
		<comments>http://benchmarkitconsulting.com/colin-stasiuk/2009/06/11/sql-2000-replication-changing-recovery-mode/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Stasiuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmark IT Consulting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Stasiuk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Changing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recovery Mode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Replication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL 2000]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benchmarkitconsulting.com/?p=747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Short Answer: YES It had been a while since I worked with SQL 2000 Replication so I was fairly confident that you could but wasn&#8217;t willing to just go and do it without a proper test first. I took at copy of the database that I was looking to do this on and built myself [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-752" title="sql200repl2" src="http://benchmarkitconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/sql200repl2.jpg" alt="sql200repl2" width="405" height="268" /></p>
<p>Short Answer: YES</p>
<p>It had been a while since I worked with SQL 2000 Replication so I was fairly confident that you could but wasn&#8217;t willing to just go and do it without a proper test first.</p>
<p>I took at copy of the database that I was looking to do this on and built myself a little test enivornment.  I made sure my database was in full recovery mode&#8230; setup a transactional replication publication, distributor, and subscriber identical to the environment I&#8217;m wanting to do this on.  I inserted, updated, and deleted some rows just to make sure everything was tickity-boo before doing my test.</p>
<p>I altered the publisher database and set the recovery mode to Simple without doing anything special to replication&#8230; I did more inserts, updates, and deletes and everything flowed through smoothly.  I switch it back to Full Recovery Mode and lather, rinse, repeat and everything still worked fine.</p>
<p>When I <a href="http://www.bing.com/" target="_blank">Binged</a> the question I didn&#8217;t get many (or any) hits that applied.  One link I went to (totally unrelated) was very scary/interesting&#8230; A user asked about using Simple Recovery Mode and whether Replication will work or not&#8230; someone told them that you can&#8217;t use simple recovery mode cause transactional replication depends on the transaction log and that a checkpoint will flush everything out (replicated or not) and cause replication to fail. </p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-801" title="fdjhfdfd" src="http://benchmarkitconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/fdjhfdfd.jpg" alt="fdjhfdfd" width="461" height="404" /></p>
<p>*sigh* another example of why you don&#8217;t want to take everything you read at face value without investigating on your own.  Some answers are just clearly wrong (like the one above)&#8230; while others are kind of right depending on the situation and need.  My replication test I just performed worked successfully for me but just for arguements sake what if there was a publication setting somewhere that would invalidate your publication and force you into a reinitializing your subscribers?</p>
<p>I guess the moral of the story is something that has been commented on by many people in the community.  The internet is a great resource for finding information and answers but at the end of the day it&#8217;s up to YOU to test and ensure that the information and answers you get are right for you and your environment.</p>
<p>Enjoy!!!</p>
<p><span><a href="http://benchmarkitconsulting.com" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-402" title="benchmark_sm" src="http://benchmarkitconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/benchmark_sm.jpg" alt="" width="157" height="74" /></a><a href="http://sqlserverpedia.com/wiki/Editors#Colin_Stasiuk" target="_blank"><img src="http://sqlserverpedia.com/badges/SQLServerPedia_Badge_Blogger.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="60" /> </a></span></p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=SQL+2000+Replication%26%238230%3B+changing+Recovery+Mode+http://tinyurl.com/lh75ks" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://benchmarkitconsulting.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-big4.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://delicious.com/post?url=http://benchmarkitconsulting.com/colin-stasiuk/2009/06/11/sql-2000-replication-changing-recovery-mode/&amp;title=SQL+2000+Replication%26%238230%3B+changing+Recovery+Mode" title="Post to Delicious"><img class="nothumb" src="http://benchmarkitconsulting.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-delicious-big4.png" alt="Post to Delicious" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://digg.com/submit?url=http://benchmarkitconsulting.com/colin-stasiuk/2009/06/11/sql-2000-replication-changing-recovery-mode/&amp;title=SQL+2000+Replication%26%238230%3B+changing+Recovery+Mode" title="Post to Digg"><img class="nothumb" src="http://benchmarkitconsulting.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-digg-big4.png" alt="Post to Digg" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://benchmarkitconsulting.com/colin-stasiuk/2009/06/11/sql-2000-replication-changing-recovery-mode/&amp;title=SQL+2000+Replication%26%238230%3B+changing+Recovery+Mode" title="Post to StumbleUpon"><img class="nothumb" src="http://benchmarkitconsulting.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-su-big4.png" alt="Post to StumbleUpon" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://benchmarkitconsulting.com/colin-stasiuk/2009/06/11/sql-2000-replication-changing-recovery-mode/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

